Overview

Bayview On The Park

52 Queens Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
+61 392 439 999

฿ 2,645+

Overall guest ratings

7.2/10 Good
Based on 3,409 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.1
  • 8.2
  • 5.6
  • 4.8

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Bayview On The Park offers an airport shuttle at scheduled times and puts you within a 10-minute drive of Melbourne Cricket Ground and St. Kilda Beach. The outdoor pool is a great spot to take a dip, and guests can grab a bite to eat at Sails Brasserie, which serves local cuisine and is open for breakfast and dinner. A poolside bar and a fitness center are other highlights, and rooms at this upscale hotel offer refrigerators and bathrobes.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Fitness centre
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Business centre
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Outdoor pool
    • No smoking
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Laundry facilities
    • Free Internet
    • Pets not allowed
    • Parking (surcharge)
    • Storage available
    • Wedding services
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 3,409 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      7.2 "Great parking, according to 72%."
      9.6 "City centre within easy reach, said 96%."
      8.6 "86% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.0 "90% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "100% appreciated the closeness to the beach."
    • 8.2 "Good value."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      9.0 "90% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.1 "81% were happy with the room service."
      9.3 "93% found the restaurant service to be one of the best."
      7.8 "78% said the concierge service was amazing."
    • 7.9 "Good pool."
    • 7.0 "Good breakfast."
    • 5.6 "Average comfort."
      5.5 "Beds were acceptable for 55%."
    • 4.8 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.2 "For 88%, the rooms looked old."
      2.5 "75% found problems with the furniture."
      1.5 "85% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
      2.6 "74% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.4 "66% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.3 "Internet is poor."
      2.5 "75% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.5 "For 65%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      1.1 "89% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.9 "91% complained about the elevator."
      0.8 "92% didn't like the architecture."
    • 2.2 "Horrible vibe."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.5 "For 65%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      2.4 "76% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.3 Good
    Based on 1,704 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      7.6 "Great parking, according to 76%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.4 "City centre within easy reach, said 94%."
      8.9 "89% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 8.3 "Good value."
    • 7.9 "Good service."
      8.5 "85% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.8 "78% were happy with the room service."
    • 7.8 "Good bar."
    • 7.7 "Good pool."
    • 4.7 "Not very clean."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were dirty."
      2.0 "80% said the bathroom was dirty."
      4.5 "55% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      4.9 "51% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were dirty."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      0.6 "94% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.3 "For 87%, the rooms looked old."
      2.3 "77% found problems with the furniture."
      1.3 "87% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."
      2.0 "80% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.9 "71% had problems with the shower."
      4.4 "56% were disappointed with the minibar."
      3.2 "68% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.5 "Internet is poor."
      2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.8 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.8 "92% complained about the elevator."
      3.8 "For 62%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      1.0 "90% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.9 "91% didn't like the architecture."
    • 2.4 "Horrible vibe."
      1.3 "87% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.5 "75% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
      3.8 "For 62%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.3 Good
    Based on 681 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      7.3 "Great parking, according to 73%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      8.8 "88% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."
    • 8.2 "Pool is good."
    • 8.2 "Good value."
    • 7.8 "Good service."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.9 "79% were happy with the room service."
    • 7.1 "Good breakfast."
    • 5.6 "Average comfort."
      5.4 "Beds were acceptable for 54%."
    • 4.8 "Not very clean."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were dirty."
      1.5 "85% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were dirty."
      1.2 "For 88%, the rooms looked old."
      1.7 "83% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.6 "74% had problems with the shower."
      2.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 77%."
      2.1 "79% found problems with the furniture."
      1.5 "85% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.8 "Terrible amenities."
      2.6 "74% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.3 "87% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.7 "93% didn't like the architecture."
      3.0 "For 70%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.8 "92% complained about the elevator."
    • 2.0 "Horrible vibe."
      1.3 "87% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.2 "78% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
      3.0 "For 70%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    Based on 204 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      7.3 "Great parking, according to 73%."
    • 8.3 "Good value."
    • 8.3 "Great service."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 7.3 "Good breakfast."
    • 5.6 "Average comfort."
      5.6 "Beds were acceptable for 56%."
    • 5.0 "Rooms are ok."
      5.5 "Only 55% said rooms were clean enough."
      5.6 "Beds were acceptable for 56%."
    • 3.6 "Internet is poor."
      2.7 "73% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.2 "For 68%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      1.1 "89% complained about the elevator."
    • 2.0 "Horrible vibe."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.2 "For 68%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 818 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."
    • 8.1 "Bar is amazing."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.7 "77% were happy with the room service."
    • 8.0 "Pool is good."
    • 6.2 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.7 "Not very clean."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      4.1 "59% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 4.4 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.9 "For 91%, the rooms looked old."
      1.5 "85% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
      2.5 "75% found problems with the furniture."
      1.7 "83% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.2 "78% had problems with the shower."
    • 3.0 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.2 "78% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      2.4 "76% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.0 "90% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.9 "91% complained about the elevator."
      0.7 "93% didn't like the architecture."
      3.6 "For 64%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 1.9 "Horrible vibe."
      0.9 "91% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.3 "77% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
      3.6 "For 64%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention
    More
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close