Overview

Rayfont South Bund Hotel Shanghai

118 Nancang Street, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200011, China
+86 216 377 1188

฿ 1,085+

Overall guest ratings

7.3/10 Good
Based on 2,341 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.6
  • 8.5
  • 4.4
  • 4.1

Nearby

    show all

    About

    At Rayfont South Bund Hotel Shanghai, you'll be within a 10-minute drive of The Bund and Yu Yuan Garden. Guests can take a dip in the indoor pool or grab a bite to eat at Yu Sheng Fang restaurant, which serves lunch and dinner. Rooms at this upscale hotel offer up nice touches like pillow menus, bathrobes, and slippers.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Fitness centre
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Coffee shop
    • Business centre
    • Car hire
    • Concierge service
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Laundry service
    • Room service
    • Game room
    • Indoor pool
    • Express check out
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Sauna
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • ATM on-site
    • Laundry facilities
    • Restaurant
    • Free Internet
    • Pets not allowed
    • Free parking
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.3 Good
    Based on 2,341 reviews
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      9.3 "Easily accessible by car, said 93%."
      9.6 "Near to public transport, according to 96%."
      8.9 "89% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.4 "94% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.1 "91% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.6 "City centre within easy reach, said 86%."
      7.0 "70% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 8.5 "Good value."
    • 6.0 "Service is ok."
      6.3 "63% said the reception staff was ok."
      5.8 "Only 58% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      6.2 "Only 62% thought the service was professional."
      5.8 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 58%."
      5.7 "Only 57% were satisfied with the booking process."
    • 4.4 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      1.8 "For 82%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% said rooms were small."
      3.7 "63% complained about the bathroom."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were dirty."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.6 "For 94%, the rooms looked old."
      4.5 "55% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.1 "69% had problems with the shower."
      2.0 "80% found problems with the furniture."
      2.4 "76% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 66%."
      1.3 "87% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.3 "67% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
    • 4.0 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.8 "Not very clean."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were dirty."
      2.4 "76% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.8 "62% thought it was rather dirty."
      0.0 "Unclean dining area, according to 100%."
    • 3.7 "Bad amenities."
      3.5 "65% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.8 "For 82%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 725 reviews
    • 8.7 "Good value."
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      9.5 "Near to public transport, according to 95%."
      9.2 "Easily accessible by car, said 92%."
      8.7 "87% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.2 "City centre within easy reach, said 82%."
    • 5.3 "Service is ok."
      5.6 "Only 56% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      5.8 "Only 58% thought the service was professional."
      5.4 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 54%."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      3.6 "64% complained about the bathroom."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.6 "84% found problems with the furniture."
      2.9 "71% had problems with the shower."
      4.2 "58% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.0 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.5 "Not very comfortable."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      4.2 "58% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.4 "Internet is poor."
      3.5 "65% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.6 Good
    Based on 374 reviews
    • 8.5 "Good value."
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      9.3 "Easily accessible by car, said 93%."
      9.2 "Near to public transport, according to 92%."
    • 6.2 "Service is ok."
      5.6 "Only 56% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 4.6 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.7 "Not very clean."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.6 "Bad amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
      3.7 "63% complained about the bathroom."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.2 "68% had problems with the shower."
    • 3.4 "Internet is poor."
      3.5 "65% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.6 Good
    Based on 842 reviews
    • 8.7 "Good value."
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      9.3 "Easily accessible by car, said 93%."
      9.7 "Near to public transport, according to 97%."
      8.8 "88% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.4 "94% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 6.6 "Service is ok."
      6.3 "Only 63% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      6.8 "68% said the reception staff was ok."
      6.2 "Only 62% thought the service was professional."
    • 4.2 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      1.9 "For 81%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
      3.4 "66% complained about the bathroom."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      0.3 "97% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.1 "79% found problems with the furniture."
      1.4 "86% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.9 "Bad amenities."
      3.6 "64% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.9 "For 81%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.8 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      2.8 "72% said rooms were small."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 397 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      9.1 "Easily accessible by car, said 91%."
      9.7 "Near to public transport, according to 97%."
      9.5 "95% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.6 "Good value."
    • 6.1 "Service is ok."
      5.5 "Only 55% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      6.7 "Only 67% thought the service was professional."
      6.5 "65% said the reception staff was ok."
    • 3.9 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were small."
      5.0 "Beds were acceptable for 50%."
    • 3.7 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.1 "99% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.4 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      2.2 "78% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.4 "Internet is poor."
      3.5 "65% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map