Overview

Kishu Tetsudo Nagoya Sakae Hotel

3-7-13 Nishiki, Naka-ku, Nagoya 460-0003, Japan
+81 529 510 841

฿ 1,514+

Overall guest ratings

7.2/10 Good
Based on 1,771 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.1
  • 8.1
  • 4.7
  • 4.4

Nearby

    show all

    About

    When you stay at Kishu Tetsudo Nagoya Sakae Hotel, you'll be within a 10-minute drive of Nagoya Castle and Nagoya City Science Museum. Free perks include full breakfast and WiFi. All rooms feature refrigerators and bathrobes.

    More hotel details about Kishu Tetsudo Nagoya Sakae Hotel

    Kishu Tetsudo Nagoya Sakae Hotel Prices:

    ฿ 44 - ฿ 81 (Based on average prices for a Standard Room)

    Kishu Tetsudo Nagoya Sakae Hotel Rooms:

    53 rooms

    Other names used to reference this hotel:

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Air-conditioned
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry service
    • Pets not allowed
    • Parking (surcharge)
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 1,771 reviews
    • 8.1 "Breakfast is good."
    • 8.1 "Location is great."
      9.3 "93% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 98%."
      8.6 "Near to public transport, according to 86%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 6.9 "Service is ok."
      6.0 "60% said the recreation staff was ok."
    • 4.7 "Internet is poor."
      3.8 "62% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 4.4 "Rooms are not good."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were small."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "95% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.5 "75% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.1 "89% had problems with the shower."
      0.9 "For 91%, the rooms looked old."
      1.6 "84% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 90%."
      3.3 "67% found problems with the furniture."
      1.8 "82% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      3.3 "67% were unhappy with the view."
    • 4.2 "Bad amenities."
      4.4 "56% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.7 "93% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.6 "84% found the grounds unpleasant."
      3.3 "For 67%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 4.1 "Not very comfortable."
      3.0 "70% said rooms were small."
      2.1 "79% thought it was too noisy."
      2.5 "75% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 90%."
    • 3.0 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "95% said the bathroom was dirty."
      4.2 "58% thought it was rather dirty."
      0.0 "100% said that wellness & sports facilities were unclean."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    Based on 389 reviews
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      9.1 "91% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 8.0 "Breakfast is good."
    • 7.6 "Wellness & sports facilities were pleasant enough."
    • 7.0 "Good service."
    • 4.4 "Bad amenities."
      4.7 "53% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "96% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 89%."
    • 3.5 "Not very comfortable."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      2.1 "79% thought it was too noisy."
      1.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 89%."
    • 3.0 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "96% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.7 "Horrible vibe."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.0 Good
    Based on 354 reviews
    • 8.2 "Breakfast is good."
    • 8.1 "Location is great."
      9.4 "94% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.1 "91% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.8 "Wellness & sports facilities were pleasant enough."
    • 6.8 "Service is ok."
      6.7 "Only 67% thought the service was professional."
    • 4.0 "Bad amenities."
      4.3 "57% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.7 "93% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.4 "Not very comfortable."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      2.2 "78% thought it was too noisy."
    • 2.9 "Awful rooms."
      2.0 "80% said rooms were dirty."
      2.4 "76% complained about the bathroom."
      2.6 "74% said rooms were small."
      0.4 "96% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.6 "Horrible vibe."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 2.4 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.0 "80% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "96% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.8 "62% thought it was rather dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.3 Good
    Based on 230 reviews
    • 8.9 "Good value."
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
      9.0 "90% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 98%."
    • 6.7 "Service is ok."
    • 4.6 "Rooms are not good."
      2.1 "79% complained about the bathroom."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "For 93%, the rooms looked old."
      0.9 "91% had problems with the shower."
    • 4.2 "Bad amenities."
      4.2 "58% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.6 "94% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.4 "Not very clean."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.5 "Horrible vibe."
      0.9 "91% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.4 Good
    Based on 796 reviews
    • 8.1 "Breakfast is good."
    • 8.1 "Location is great."
      9.1 "91% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 98%."
    • 7.9 "Wellness & sports facilities were pleasant enough."
    • 7.1 "Good service."
      7.2 "72% said the reception staff was great."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.2 "72% thought the service was very professional."
    • 4.8 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were small."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "95% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.5 "75% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.0 "90% had problems with the shower."
      1.8 "82% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.2 "For 88%, the rooms looked old."
    • 4.8 "Internet is poor."
      4.0 "60% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 4.4 "Not very comfortable."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were small."
      1.7 "83% thought it was too noisy."
      2.5 "75% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.0 "Bad amenities."
      4.3 "57% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.7 "93% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.5 "85% found the grounds unpleasant."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "95% said the bathroom was dirty."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close